Back to Editorials
The Indian ExpressMarch 21, 2026

Ganga belongs to all, don’t discriminate

That 14 young men were arrested by the Varanasi Police because they took a boat out on the river Ganga and broke their Ramzan fast — after a video they made of their iftar party went viral and the BJP Yuva Morcha city unit chief filed a complaint — is disquieting. A routine excursion is being painted as a crime. The accusations sound forced, disproportionate and repressive. They range from hurting “religious sentiment” and defiling a religious place to water pollution, from consuming non-vegetarian food and throwing leftovers into the river to extortion — the last has been added after boat operators belatedly alleged that threats were issued and the boat taken forcibly. What is striking is the alacrity with which the police made the arrests, and the promptness with which a Varanasi court rejected bail applications and sent the accused to judicial custody. The police show no such urgency to act on hate speech, for instance, even after the apex court has mandated that FIRs be registered suo motu, without waiting for a complaint. And in most cases, the court drags its feet till the process itself becomes punishment. But the episode is disturbing, most of all, because of the charges that lie at its centre.

They reek of intolerance and describe a shrinking — of the Ganga’s capacious myth and story. It is sacred for Hindus, of course, but it is also a river that belongs to all. The Ganga does not discriminate as it bears witness and carries family memories. Regardless of the faith of those who make it their own, it is forgiving and nurturing. The charges against the 14 young men mirror a narrowing, too, of the lived reality of an ancient and large-hearted city made of its teeming diversities. Varanasi, the Prime Minister’s constituency, is the city of narrow lanes where moving forward calls for negotiation and conversation with others, and a cultural landscape where arguments are carefully crafted and savoured, regardless of who wins or loses. It is the site, also, of ongoing makeovers that are helping it to turn its face to the future, from the renovated Kashi Vishwanath temple complex to the redevelopment of the ghats, from projects of urban expansion to those of connectivity and mobility. The attempt to divide the Ganga, to claim that only one community owns it, is jarring and out of place in Kashi.

TheYogi Adityanathgovernment must take note of the overzealousness of its police, and correct it. At stake is its own attempt to turn UP into a state that is dynamic and forward moving. That is undermined when it is circumscribed and weighed down by a politics that stokes divides.

Key GK Takeaways for CLAT
  • 1The arrests under charges like "hurting religious sentiment" highlight the application of sections in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), replacing IPC 295/295A, concerning religious offences. The prompt rejection of bail applications by the Varanasi court, despite the seemingly minor nature of the alleged acts, raises concerns regarding the due process and personal liberty enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution. This situation underscores the importance of understanding the balance between public order and individual freedoms, particularly in cases involving religious sentiments.
  • 2This incident exemplifies concerns about selective law enforcement and police overzealousness, contrasting their swift action here with inaction on hate speech, despite Supreme Court directives for suo motu FIRs. The state government, led by Yogi Adityanath, faces scrutiny regarding its control over police conduct and ensuring impartial application of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). Such incidents can undermine public trust in governance and the rule of law, especially when political influence is perceived.
  • 3The incident reflects a disturbing trend of intolerance and the shrinking of shared public spaces, like the Ganga, which traditionally transcend religious boundaries. Such actions can exacerbate communal divides and negatively impact social cohesion within diverse cities like Varanasi. Aspirants should understand how perceived attacks on cultural practices or religious sentiments can have broader societal implications, affecting community relations and the inclusive fabric of Indian society.
  • 4While religiously framed, the charges of water pollution against the individuals bring attention to environmental regulations concerning river bodies. The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, and initiatives like the National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG), aim to protect such vital resources. This case, despite its controversial context, highlights the legal framework for environmental protection and the importance of responsible public conduct near natural resources, irrespective of religious activities.