Back to Editorials
The Indian ExpressApril 3, 2026

Maharashtra Police ‘walk of shame’ is a shame for the police

A trend that began in Nashik and is spreading to other jurisdictions in Maharashtra flags the dangers of the police chasing virality by undermining institutional propriety and publicity at the cost of due process. Over the past six months, Nashik Police have been putting out videos that are circulated on their official digital handles as well as through local news and social media groups, in which theaccused are paraded before cameras, with the slogan “Nashik zilla kaydyacha balekilla (Nashik district, a fortress of law and order)”. Similar videos have emerged in parts of Thane as well. This unseemly “walk of shame” violates the rule of law in letter and spirit, and paints the police force not as a guardian of due process but as the bully with the biggest stick.

According to Maharashtra Inspector General (law and order) Manoj Kumar Sharma, there have been no instructions to create such videos. However, the parading of criminals, the performance of apparently forced acts and words of contrition, are not isolated aberrant actions by individual officers. Nashik Commissioner Sandeep Karnik, who claims the (dubious) credit for starting the trend, says that the “fortress of law and order” videos began after some young people produced a video last year calling Nashik a “fortress of crime”. Since then, several alleged offenders, including those linked to local political figures, have been publicly shamed. At times, the alleged criminals appear to be limping in the videos.

The Nashik Police’s actions have raised valid concerns over due process. Policing must not be an algorithmically driven popularity contest. The scheme of crime and punishment in a constitutional democracy does not rely on “shame”, or on officers of the law turning into vigilantes. In fact, the Nashik Police, through its viral videos, is actually admitting to a fundamental failure in discharging its duties and undermining trust in the broader justice system. It is for the judiciary to pronounce guilt or innocence and apportion punishment according to the law. “Walks of shame” are reminiscent more of regressive khap panchayats than a modern police force. The officers responsible for the open travesty of due process in Nashik and beyond must be held to account. The message must go out from the highest quarters that films like Dabangg and Singham are works of fiction, not police instruction manuals.

Key GK Takeaways for CLAT
  • 1The "walk of shame" by Maharashtra Police directly violates Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, encompassing the right to a fair procedure and dignity. Such actions undermine the fundamental principle of presumption of innocence until proven guilty by a court, as enshrined within the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) regarding arrest and investigation protocols. This constitutes a grave breach of due process.
  • 2The police parading of accused persons, as seen in Nashik, represents a significant failure in democratic governance and police accountability. It bypasses the established rule of law, wherein only the judiciary can pronounce guilt and punishment, not law enforcement acting as vigilantes. This erodes institutional propriety and public trust in the state's ability to uphold justice impartially, demanding accountability from officers responsible for such actions.
  • 3The "walk of shame" inflicts severe social stigma on alleged offenders, potentially hindering their future rehabilitation and reintegration into society, irrespective of eventual judicial outcomes. Such public shaming tactics, reminiscent of regressive practices, erode societal trust in the justice system's fairness and impartiality. This creates a chilling effect, fostering fear rather than respect for law enforcement and impacting community relations negatively.
  • 4While a domestic issue, the "walk of shame" reflects poorly on India's commitment to international human rights standards, particularly those enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Such actions, violating due process and human dignity, can attract international scrutiny and criticism, potentially impacting India's global image as a nation upholding rule of law and fundamental freedoms.