Punjab’s sacrilege Bill is regressive and draconian
Baisakhi day this year saw the Punjab Assembly table a bill that bears the troubling hallmarks of a regressive and draconian law. The Jagat Jot Sri Guru Granth Sahib Satkar (Amendment) Bill, 2026, passed unanimously in a special session, proposes life imprisonment or, at the very least, a minimum jail term of seven years along with a fine of up to Rs 25 lakh for any person found guilty of desecrating the Guru Granth Sahib. The Bill expands the definition of sacrilege in sweeping and disturbing ways. It moves beyond acts of physical damage such as burning, tearing or theft to encompass spoken, written, symbolic and even electronic expressions that may be construed as hurting religious sentiments. In doing so, it could grant a licence to those who would invoke the fig leaf of “hurt sentiments” to target and silence others. Coming in the run-up to the assembly elections next year , the AAP government appears not merely intent on courting a section of the electorate but also on asserting authority over the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee, which has historically controlled gurdwara affairs, by mandating stricter oversight over the publication of the Sikh holy book.
The Bill, the third of its kind, is the most stringent. The first, tabled in 2016 by the Akali-BJP government, was rejected by the Centre for discriminating against other religions, while the second, brought in during the Congress government in 2018, did not receive the Governor’s assent. Its introduction comes more than a decade after a series of sacrilege incidents rocked the state in 2015. On June 1 that year, the Guru Granth Sahib was stolen from a gurdwara in Burj Jawahar Singh Wala village in Faridkot. Four months later, its torn pages were found in neighbouring Bargari village, along with anonymous posters claiming the act was retribution for alleged disrespect to the head of the Sirsa-based Dera Sacha Sauda. The protests that followed were seen to be the final nail in the coffin of the then Akali government. The case drags on, becoming an issue in elections.
It is unfortunate that the AAP government has chosen to rekindle these embers, even as Punjab grapples with urgent challenges: The menace of gangsters and extortion, the scourge of drugs, a faltering economy, and depleted state coffers. The Bill has triggered disquiet in a state that has long prided itself on its secular ethos, despite the intricate interplay of religion and politics in its public life. There can be no greater irony than that this legislation was tabled on Baisakhi, when Guru Gobind Singh founded the Khalsa by uniting five men from diverse backgrounds across India, transcending the barriers of caste and creed to create a fellowship.
- 1The Punjab government's sacrilege bill exemplifies the complex interplay between religion and state politics, a key theme in Indian governance. Passed by the AAP government ahead of elections, it appears designed to consolidate a voter base and assert authority over the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC). This highlights how legislative actions can be driven by electoral calculations, potentially overshadowing core governance and public welfare objectives.
- 2The bill raises significant constitutional questions concerning Article 19(1)(a) (freedom of speech) and Article 14 (equality). By prescribing life imprisonment for desecrating a specific holy book, it could be challenged for being discriminatory and imposing unreasonable restrictions on expression. This is a departure from the general provision under Section 323 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which addresses outraging religious feelings more broadly.
- 3The legislation's broad definition of sacrilege, including spoken and electronic expressions, poses a significant threat to social harmony. It risks empowering fringe elements to weaponize "hurt sentiments" to suppress dissent and target individuals, potentially undermining Punjab's secular fabric. This move is particularly ironic as it was tabled on Baisakhi, a day founded by Guru Gobind Singh to promote unity beyond caste and creed.
- 4The focus on the sacrilege bill highlights a potential misallocation of legislative and administrative resources by the Punjab government. By prioritizing this divisive issue, the state risks neglecting urgent economic and social challenges like the drug menace, organized crime, and a faltering economy. This demonstrates how populist legislation can divert attention from critical issues directly impacting a state's development and long-term stability.
