Thank you, Viktor Axelsen, for the game
It can’t be said that Viktor Axelsen did not get his due after winning the Olympic gold twice. Though Denmark boasted of a 1992 Olympic champion in Poul Erik-Hoyer Larsen and one of the most popular contemporaries of Lin Dan and Lee Chong Wei in Peter Gade thereafter, Axelsen went past them all with World titles to add to his Olympic wins. But he was acutely aware of how badminton lagged behind tennis, after compatriot Caroline Wozniacki became tennis’s World No 1. Till his last tournament, Axelsen fought for shuttlers to be accorded the same respect and riches as tennis granted.
In his prime, Axelsen seemed invincible. From 2018 till 2025, he won 27 Tour titles and lost just 6 finals. In all, he had 31 tournament wins and 13 losses, even as the start of his career overlapped with legends Lin, Lee and Kento Momota in their prime. Axelsen was often ruthless but his popularity in Asia remained immense, given how much he won. Perhaps what places him a notch lower than Lin is the absence of a rival like Lee who could keep pushing him.
On the other hand, it may be argued that Axelsen would brook no resistance, continuously upgrading his game. H S Prannoy ended his World Championship hat-trick ambitions in 2023, but Axelsen gave Lakshya Sen no chance in 2024 in the Olympic semifinal. His reach, steepness of smash and court coverage put paid to the ambition of most of his opponents.
- 1Viktor Axelsen's advocacy for athlete welfare highlights the crucial role of national sports federations and government bodies. In India, the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, through entities like the Sports Authority of India (SAI), implements policies such as the Target Olympic Podium Scheme (TOPS). These governance structures are vital for talent identification, funding, and ensuring athletes receive adequate support, directly impacting national sporting performance.
- 2The popularity of Danish player Viktor Axelsen in Asia exemplifies sports diplomacy as a form of soft power, strengthening international relations. Athletes acting as cultural ambassadors foster goodwill between nations, such as Denmark and India, supplementing formal diplomatic channels. This phenomenon showcases how sporting personalities can significantly enhance a country's global image and influence, a key aspect of contemporary international affairs.
- 3Axelsen’s fight for better pay for shuttlers brings focus to the legal framework governing athletes' rights and contracts. Disputes over remuneration and sponsorship often fall under contract law, with bodies like the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) acting as a crucial dispute resolution forum. This underscores the need for robust legal agreements to protect athletes' financial interests against powerful sports federations.
- 4The editorial's comparison of badminton and tennis reveals significant economic disparities in professional sports, a key social issue. Factors like broadcasting rights and sponsorship deals create vast differences in prize money and earning potential for athletes. This economic gap impacts a sport's development, its accessibility to aspiring talents, and its overall viability as a professional career path for individuals across the globe.