Work in progress: On the Household social consumption (health) survey
The 80th, and latest, round of the household social consumption (health) survey conducted by the National Statistical Office is the first comprehensive survey of its kind in both the post-pandemic era and the period in which the Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY) scheme attained maturity. The previous two surveys of the same kind revealed that most Indians did not have any form of health insurance. Since PMJAY’s launch in 2018, the
80th round shows that insurance coverage has expanded around threefold, accounting for an increasing share of health-care financing in hospitals. However, the hospitalisation rate has not recovered to the 2014 level, meaning that having an insurance card still does not guarantee access to a bed, and hidden costs continue to limit access. The reimbursement rates under PMJAY and State-funded insurance schemes are often below market rates, so private hospitals compensate by billing patients separately for diagnostics and ancillary services. In other words, while state-funded health insurance is subsidising private health-care providers’ access to low-income markets without also enforcing regulated prices, the combined system provides a safety net where insurance covers hospitalisation and the public network has improved financial protection for households seeking primary care. Second, the Proportion of Population Reported Ailing has doubled, while infectious diseases have declined and non-communicable diseases have increased. Economists have interpreted this as a sign of more people seeking care, thus becoming ‘visible’ to the health-care sector.
Previous surveys singled out out-of-pocket expenses (OOPE) on health care as a leading cause of poverty. In the 80th round, while the mean OOPE has roughly doubled, the median OOPE has dropped, to ₹11,285 per hospitalisation and at nearly nothing for public outpatient care. Health-care expenses in India are a mix of many low-cost consultations and a few significant and expensive interactions, such as surgeries and chronic care. The two trends thus mean that while health care is becoming more affordable, thanks to the public sector absorbing the cost of primary and secondary care, health care’s ability to inflict financial deprivation in a few cases remains high. Part of the problem is the AAM network, which provides free medicines and diagnostics, of Ayushman Bharat still being significantly underfunded relative to the needs of managing chronic diseases, and where the private sector dominates. Thus, overall, the poor have nominal coverage but are often excluded from the benefits of coverage in practice while the more insured middle class faces rising catastrophic costs. The next phase of health-care reform, after shielding care-seekers from poverty and achieving near-universal institutional delivery, will need to strengthen public sector hospital capacity to compete with the private sector for tertiary care.
- 1The government's initiatives like Ayushman Bharat PMJAY reflect its constitutional obligation under Article 47 of the DPSP to improve public health and living standards. The NSO's 80th survey, indicating expanded insurance coverage but persistent access issues, highlights the complex governance challenge in balancing public welfare with private sector engagement. Effective regulation and strengthening public sector capacity, as suggested, are vital for India to move towards a truly equitable healthcare system, aligning with the broader goals of social justice enshrined in the Preamble.
- 2India's domestic health policy, exemplified by the Ayushman Bharat PMJAY scheme, represents a significant governmental commitment to universal health coverage, a key Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 3). However, the survey reveals implementation gaps, such as the hospitalisation rate not recovering to 2014 levels and the poor facing practical exclusion despite nominal coverage. Future policy reforms must prioritize strengthening the public sector and regulating private healthcare costs to bridge the existing equity chasm and ensure effective healthcare delivery for all.
- 3The challenges of hidden costs and unregulated private hospital billing practices, as highlighted by the survey, underscore the urgent need for robust legal and regulatory interventions. While the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010, exists, its effective implementation and scope to control pricing remain limited, allowing private players to circumvent affordability for many. Landmark judgments affirming the right to health as part of Article 21, such as *Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal*, demand that the state ensure accessible and affordable healthcare through stricter price caps and oversight mechanisms.
- 4The survey reveals a nuanced socio-economic landscape: while insurance coverage expanded threefold and median out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) dropped to ₹11,285 per hospitalisation, the mean OOPE doubled, indicating persistent financial vulnerability. The rise in non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and the observation that the poor are nominally covered but practically excluded, while the insured middle class faces catastrophic costs, highlight deep-seated inequities. Addressing this requires not just expanding insurance but also significantly increasing public health spending, ideally towards the 2.5% of GDP target set by the National Health Policy 2017, to provide truly universal and equitable care.
