Back to Editorials
The Indian ExpressJune 12, 2026

Bharathiraja took Tamil Nadu’s red soil to the silver screen

Everywhere Bharathiraja looked, he seemed to see potential. He looked around rural Tamil Nadu — the red soil of its fields, dried river beds and waving palm trees — and saw its cinematic beauty. Until he trained the lens on village life in his directorial debut 16 Vayathinile, Tamil cinema’s aesthetics were bound by the limits of the studio and the sensibilities of its largely city-based storytellers. They determined what could be shot and whose stories could be told. By bringing in the sights and textures of rural Tamil life on the screen — gently exploring how caste, inequality and deprivation shaped relationships — Bharathiraja, who died this week at the age of 84, changed its grammar forever. The filmmaker, who made such classics as Kizhakke Pogum Rail, Sigappu Rojakkal, Vedam Puthithu and Mudhal Mariyadhai, was also a master at spotting the potential in people. Partly out of instinct and partly as a gesture of defiance against an industry that had stymied his own ambitions of becoming a star, he launched the careers of actors like Revathi, Radhikaa and Karthik. His journey, from a village in Theni district to the ‘Iyakkunar Imayam’ (pinnacle among directors), inspired filmmakers such as writer-director K Bhagyaraj, Parthiban and Pandiarajan, whose work embodied the same granular approach to storytelling. Music was key to the appeal of Bharathiraja’s films, owing largely to his long partnership with Ilaiyaraaja. A relationship that dated back to when the duo, along with the composer’s brothers, performed at communist meetings, it was instrumental in establishing the soundtrack of rural Tamil Nadu . Even today songs like ‘Sendhoora poove’ (16 Vayathinile) and ‘Kodiyile malligai poo’ (Kadalora Kavithaigal), rooted in folk traditions and evoking a certain romance with the rural, continue to stir the imagination of moviegoers.

Key GK Takeaways for CLAT
  • 1Cinema in India enjoys constitutional protection as a form of expression under Article 19(1)(a), subject to the reasonable restrictions in Article 19(2). The Supreme Court in K.A. Abbas versus Union of India (1970) upheld pre-censorship of films but insisted it stay within constitutional limits, recognising film's unique power to move audiences. Bharathiraja's depiction of caste and rural deprivation shows how that expressive freedom lets cinema hold a mirror to social realities.
  • 2Indian cinema is a pillar of the country's soft power, a concept popularised by political scientist Joseph Nye to describe influence through culture rather than coercion. Tamil films, like Hindi cinema, circulate across the global diaspora and South and Southeast Asia, projecting Indian culture abroad. Regional filmmakers who root their work in local soil, as Bharathiraja did, enrich this cultural export and strengthen India's image in international cultural diplomacy.
  • 3Film content is regulated under the Cinematograph Act, 1952, through the Central Board of Film Certification, while creative works are protected by the Copyright Act, 1957. Music partnerships of the kind Bharathiraja shared with Ilaiyaraaja raise questions of authorship and royalties that the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 sought to address by strengthening composers' and lyricists' rights. These statutes frame both the freedom and the commercial protection of the cinematic works the editorial celebrates.
  • 4India is the world's largest film-producing nation, certifying well over 1,500 to 2,000 films a year across languages, with Tamil cinema among the most prolific regional industries. The media and entertainment sector contributes significantly to GDP and employs lakhs of people directly and indirectly. By opening rural stories and launching newcomers like Revathi and Karthik, Bharathiraja expanded both the artistic range and the talent economy of this large industry.