Long overdue: On coal exchanges
Unveiled at a time of record domestic coal production, the Coal Exchange Rules, 2026 , are a case of better-late-than-never. They will create a broad market-based mechanism through regulated trading platforms for the lynchpin of India’s energy system — coal. They are aimed at enhancing price discovery, transparency, access for small consumers, as well as, one would hope, reduce bilateral agreements that are often opaque and come with a whiff of graft, too often. Today, most coal transactions between producers and buyers take place through long-term contracts, primarily for the power sector, followed by auctions, imports and captive mining. While India’s commodity exchanges are well established, they function largely as financial markets rather than physical delivery platforms. Coal exchanges, however, appear closer in design to power exchanges, which, despite modest volumes, play a role in price discovery, market signalling and the development of secondary markets. As if to prove this point, coal exchanges are expected to serve the non-regulated sector, which relies on Coal India auctions where coal is often sold at a premium to the highest bidder. Power exchanges are not merely niche trading platforms; they serve as points of reference for the broader power market. They have enhanced price discovery and served as a balancing market without replacing long-term power purchase agreements. Initially the power exchanges were only balancing shortages, but eventually the spot prices became a barometer of the broader power market indicating scarcity, surplus and system stresses for all electricity stakeholders. Perhaps the first role of coal exchanges could be to open up inventories, allowing surpluses to balance out shortages across India. The templates for the two exchanges are not very different though the specific rules framed by the Coal Controller Organisation of India will determine the success of coal exchanges. Just as with the successes, the failures of power exchanges can also serve as lessons learned for coal. Coal is not as fungible as electricity, which once generated is the same everywhere requiring only minimum standards. Coal quality varies widely. Therefore, robust standards and quality assurance are as important as contract design, liquidity creation and enforcement. The latter set of requirements will ensure that major producers and consumers are drawn to the coal exchanges. The emphasis should be on facilitating participation of retail consumers unlike power exchanges, which are dominated by discoms. Coal India’s stance will be crucial. Besides safeguards against volatility, dispute resolution mechanisms and improved transportation logistics will be important too, since the coal exchanges will be physical delivery platforms. Published - June 13, 2026 12:10 am IST Read Comments Copy link Email Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit READ LATER SEE ALL Remove Related Topics coal / India / energy and resource
- 1Coal policy in India falls under Entry 53 of the Union List (Seventh Schedule of the Constitution), giving Parliament exclusive legislative competence over coal mines and mineral development. The Coal Exchange Rules, 2026 operate within the statutory framework of the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973, which governs coal distribution in India. The Coal Controller Organisation of India, established under this Act's delegated authority, will regulate the exchanges — illustrating how constitutional allocation of legislative powers directly shapes sectoral economic governance and the pace of market liberalisation in strategic commodities.
- 2India's energy transition requires coal to remain the bridge fuel for at least two more decades, making transparent price signals essential for planning. Coal exchange reforms echo the logic of power market liberalisation under the Electricity Act, 2003, which established independent regulation and competitive markets. Record domestic coal production — the backdrop for the 2026 rules — reflects success of commercial mining reforms post-2020, when the sector was opened to non-government entities, ending Coal India's effective monopoly over new mine allocations and significantly boosting output volumes.
- 3The Coal Controller Organisation of India, established under the Colliery Control Rules, 2004, functions as the statutory regulator for coal grades, prices, and physical distribution. Coal exchanges as physical delivery platforms require robust dispute resolution mechanisms analogous to those empowering the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission under the Electricity Act, 2003. The 'whiff of graft' the article associates with opaque bilateral coal contracts aligns with past Comptroller and Auditor General findings on irregularities in Coal India allocations, underscoring the transparency gap that market-based trading is designed to institutionally address.
- 4India produced approximately 997 million tonnes of coal in 2024-25, with Coal India accounting for around 780 million tonnes — both near-record figures. Coal powers approximately 70 percent of India's electricity generation, making price transparency a macroeconomic concern. The non-regulated sector — manufacturing, cement, and steel industries — routinely pays a significant premium over regulated power-sector prices in Coal India spot auctions. Market-based pricing through exchanges could reduce this premium, lowering input costs for energy-intensive industries and potentially easing inflationary pressure in manufactured goods.
