CLAT Tribe
Back to Editorials
The HinduJuly 23, 2026

All is not well: On the protests in Delhi

Issue-driven mobilisation by civil society groups tends to remain orderly so long as the government of the day signals that it is willing to listen and engage with genuine concerns. The scenes from Delhi on July 20 , when mostly young demonstrators were chased, tear-gassed, and baton-charged within sight of the new Parliament building, with some allegedly struck by pellet guns, while mobile Internet was switched off and Metro stations were shut across the area, were avoidable. The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) march escalated only after the police resorted to force. Had the Union government engaged with the protesters earlier, including activist Sonam Wangchuk, who was on an indefinite fast and forcibly hospitalised two days earlier, the confrontation could have been avoided. A meeting was eventually conceded through Union Minister J.P. Nadda, but only after thousands had reached Parliament’s doorstep. It came too late. That a movement born as online satire could gather millions of digital followers and bring thousands to the street says a great deal about the government’s own record, which has become the source of a litany of grievances. Recurring paper leaks in entrance examinations, the re-conducting of NEET, and the friction over the three-language formula have led to deep concerns that higher education is being administered without accountability by the government. Yet, it would be a mistake to read the anger as being about examinations alone. Increasingly, the protests have crystallised into a wider discontent over joblessness, stagnant wages and rising prices that weigh on the young across the country. The intensity of the protests also owes much to the Narendra Modi-led BJP government’s disinclination to address genuine civil society concerns except when an election is in view. Course corrections over the last 12-plus years have tended to be timed to the ballot rather than parliamentary sessions or to public disquiet, even as narrow electoral wins in Assembly and parliamentary elections are read as expansive mandates and a licence for an increasingly authoritarian style of rule. The protests, which have drawn support beyond Delhi, are reminiscent of Sri Lanka’s Aragalaya, Nepal’s Gen Z revolt and Bangladesh’s student uprising against authoritarian rule, though their scale and demands remain far narrower in comparison. That should not tempt the government to wait them out. Instead of correcting course, it has sought to reduce the protests to a political duel with the Congress-led Opposition, and to deflect attention from its failures through proxies in civil society and the media. This is self-defeating as it will only deepen youth disillusionment with the democratic system itself. An immediate step is in order. The Union Education Minister, Dharmendra Pradhan, must own the failures on his watch and resign. The alternative is an unceremonious dismissal. Published - July 23, 2026 12:20 am IST Read Comments Copy link Email Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit READ LATER SEE ALL Remove Related Topics government / Delhi / internet / Cockroach Janta Party / parliament / ministers (government) / court / judiciary (system of justice) / entrance examination / test/examination / unemployment / Narendra Modi / Bharatiya Janata Party / election / Sri Lanka / Gen Z protest in Nepal / Bangladesh / Indian National Congress / politics

Key GK Takeaways for CLAT
  • 1The Delhi protests raise questions about Article 19(1)(b)'s guarantee of peaceable assembly, which permits reasonable restrictions under Article 19(3) but not blanket suppression through internet shutdowns and baton charges. Indian courts, notably the Supreme Court in Anuradha Bhasin versus Union of India (2020), have held that internet shutdowns must be temporary, necessary, and proportionate, subject to periodic review. Repeated recourse to communication blackouts around large gatherings sits in tension with that precedent and with the accountability standards good governance demands.
  • 2The editorial's comparison to Sri Lanka's 2022 Aragalaya, Nepal's 2025 Gen Z uprising, and Bangladesh's 2024 student-led ouster of Sheikh Hasina points to a wider South Asian pattern of youth-driven protest against unresponsive governments. Each of those movements began with a narrow grievance, fuel shortages, quota reform, or price hikes, before widening into demands for systemic accountability. For CLAT aspirants, this comparative frame is useful shorthand for how economic distress can rapidly translate into political crisis across the subcontinent.
  • 3NEET's repeated controversies, including the 2024 paper-leak scandal that forced a Supreme Court-monitored inquiry, highlight recurring failures in the National Testing Agency's examination integrity safeguards. The three-language formula tension echoes older disputes over the National Education Policy 2020's language provisions, which several southern states have resisted as encroaching on federalism under the Constitution's Seventh Schedule. Use of force against protesters also invites scrutiny under provisions governing dispersal of unlawful assemblies, which require proportionate and recorded justification for each escalation.
  • 4India's youth unemployment rate has hovered near ten percent among fifteen-to-twenty-nine-year-olds in recent Periodic Labour Force Survey data, feeding the joblessness grievance the editorial highlights. Price pressures, especially in food, have kept household budgets strained even as headline GDP growth is projected around six and a half percent for the year. Such a gap between macro-level growth figures and everyday affordability is a recurring theme examiners expect students to connect to protest movements and governance critiques.

Related from CLAT Tribe Blogs