Back to Vault
Supreme Court & JudiciaryLiveLaw 08 Jun 2026

Every Grave Or Dargah Not Automatically Waqf Property; Waqf Board Can't Take Control Merely Because It Has Muslim Religious Use : Madras HC

Audio briefing - 60 seconds, powered by Gemini

Now the interesting bit for anyone tracking the Waqf debate. The Madras High Court has set aside a Tamil Nadu Waqf Board order that declared a 240-year-old dargah as Waqf property. Justice Govindarajan Thilakavathi said a property can only become Waqf if it's surveyed and notified following the procedure in the Waqf Act. So basically, the court held that not every grave or dargah automatically counts as Waqf just because it has Muslim religious use. What this really means is the Board can't claim land without due process. Bottom line for the exam, tie this to the Waqf Act and the recent Waqf law amendments that CLAT loves to test.

The Madras High Court recently set aside an order of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board declaring a 240-year-old Dargah as Waqf property. Justice Govindarajan Thilakavathi observed that for declaring a property as Waqf property, it had to be surveyed and notified as per the procedure laid down in the Waqf Act. The court added that every grave or dargah could not be termed as Waqf property and...

Your support helps us to bring you more content atan affordable subscription scheme !!!All payment options available

Originally published by LiveLaw on 08 Jun 2026. CLAT Tribe summarises and curates for exam relevance.View original
Every Grave Or Dargah Not Automatically Waqf Property; Waqf Board Can't Take Control Merely Because It Has Muslim Religious Use : Madras HC