Back to Editorials
The Indian ExpressApril 26, 2026

Hormuz blockades test foundational principle of global commerce

Few features of the global economy illustrate interdependence as clearly as maritime chokepoints. Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz has offered a stark demonstration of the risks that such narrow waterways pose to international trade. It also stirred talk of monetising these vulnerabilities, of turning chokepoints into instruments of financial leverage, by, for instance, levying transit tolls. Indonesian finance minister Purbaya Yudhi Sadewa this week publicly pondered about ways states might charge ships passing through the Strait of Malacca, another large chokepoint. He subsequently noted the impracticality of such a move, and officials in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore were quick to reaffirm their commitment to keeping the waterway open. That such a toll is even being mused about raises questions about the foundational principle on which global commerce rests: That the seas, beyond narrow territorial limits, are open to all, codified in international law with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

One of the most consequential rights in the UNCLOS is that of transit passage, or the guarantee of freedom of navigation through international straits. This principle underpins the modern maritime order, legally affirming, for example, that Iran cannot close the Strait of Hormuz (Tehran says otherwise because it is not binding), and that, hypothetically, Southeast Asian states (which have ratified UNCLOS) cannot impose tolls on the Strait of Malacca. Yet, with the onset of war, law has given way to power. Prior to the US-Israeli attack on Iran, even during the Iran-Iraq War or the 12-Day War last year, Iran had stopped short of a closure. But, faced with what it perceives as an existential threat, it has resorted to this option — the Strait of Hormuz is a strategic lever for Tehran. Any further escalation with the US is likely to harden its assertion of its rights over the Strait.

Much of India’s trade, and the world’s, flows through a handful of critical maritime chokepoints — the Strait of Hormuz, the Strait of Malacca, the Suez Canal, and the Bab al-Mandab. NewDelhishould, therefore, take the lead in reinforcing the law of the sea, ensuring the free and safe passage of vessels in international waters, and working with like-minded partners to prevent these chokepoints from becoming instruments of coercion.

Key GK Takeaways for CLAT
  • 1The principle of 'transit passage' under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is the cornerstone of maritime law, guaranteeing freedom of navigation through international straits. Iran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz creates a legal quandary, as it has not ratified UNCLOS, unlike Indonesia, which is bound by the treaty regarding the Strait of Malacca, making any toll imposition illegal.
  • 2Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz exemplifies how maritime chokepoints are weaponized as instruments of foreign policy and coercion during geopolitical conflicts, particularly against rivals like the US and Israel. This forces nations like India to engage in delicate multilateral diplomacy with partners to de-escalate tensions and secure vital sea lanes, reinforcing the need for a stable, rules-based maritime order.
  • 3The disruption of key maritime chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz and the Strait of Malacca has severe economic repercussions, threatening global supply chains and energy security. For India, which depends heavily on these routes for its trade and oil imports, such blockades can trigger inflation, disrupt industries, and adversely impact overall economic stability, highlighting a critical national vulnerability.
  • 4The vulnerability of sea lanes places a significant governance challenge on India, compelling New Delhi to adopt a proactive maritime security policy. This involves enhancing naval capabilities, leading diplomatic initiatives to uphold UNCLOS, and collaborating with strategic partners to ensure freedom of navigation. India's role is crucial in preventing these chokepoints from being used as levers of coercion, thereby safeguarding its economic interests.

Related from CLAT Tribe Blogs