Maturing approach: On the India-U.K. Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement
The India-U.K. Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) reflects New Delhi’s more mature approach to free trade negotiations. Unlike its 2009 free trade agreement (FTA) with ASEAN, which tilted the trade balance against India, New Delhi has approached the U.K. pact by attempting to balance liberalisation with domestic sensitivities amid an increasingly fragmented global trading system. A similar shift was evident in the New Zealand FTA , where India succeeded in protecting its sensitive dairy sector despite dairy products being one of New Zealand’s biggest exports. While the India-U.K. CETA is expected to strengthen India’s export competitiveness, its benefits are likely to be uneven across sectors and could place competitive pressure on already cost-disadvantaged MSMEs . The pact, an attempt to secure long-term market access and integrate India further into global value chains, offers zero-duty access on 99% of India’s exports, covering almost the entire value of bilateral trade. However, smaller firms often lack the documentation and compliance capacity needed to claim these benefits. Despite the deal including some agreements on non-tariff aspects, MSMEs may find it difficult to comply with the U.K.’s stringent sanitary, phytosanitary, technical and sustainability standards, which could prove a bigger hurdle than tariffs. Globally, such agreements have accelerated export diversification, attracted investment and facilitated technology transfer, but only when supported by robust industrial ecosystems and competitive firms. India has historically underutilised several trade agreements because of low awareness, cumbersome administration and high compliance costs. The trade deficit with ASEAN widened from about $10 billion in 2017 to nearly $44 billion in 2023. Similarly, the U.K. agreement’s benefits may remain below expectations unless India strengthens regulatory administration, intellectual property protection and dispute resolution. Although the U.K. accounts for only about 3% of India’s merchandise exports and around 1% of its imports, the U.K. pact expands India’s access to a high-income market where it enjoys a merchandise trade surplus. However, this advantage could narrow if imports of the U.K.’s relatively price-inelastic exports, such as luxury vehicles, grow faster than India’s largely labour-intensive, price-sensitive exports. The Double Contribution Convention benefits Indian IT and professional services firms, but its economy-wide benefits may remain modest. The pact also faced a hurdle over the U.K.’s steel safeguard quotas before implementation, underlining how non-tariff measures can dilute market access. India’s carbon-intensive exports could face challenges as climate-related trade regulations become more stringent. Ultimately, CETA’s success lies in turning market access into market share. Published - July 20, 2026 12:20 am IST Read Comments Copy link Email Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit READ LATER SEE ALL Remove Related Topics India-UK Free Trade Agreement / trade policy / trade agreements / ASEAN / New Zealand / dairy / exports / taxes and duties / investments / technology (general) / computing and information technology / iron and steel / climate change
- 1Trade agreements such as CETA are negotiated under the Union government's executive treaty-making power, flowing from Article 73 read with Entry 14 of the Union List, while Article 253 empowers Parliament to legislate for implementing international agreements. India does not constitutionally require prior parliamentary ratification before signing trade treaties, unlike some other democracies. This structural gap fuels recurring governance debates about parliamentary oversight of major economic commitments before they legally bind the country.
- 2CETA fits into India's post-Brexit trade diversification strategy, alongside FTAs with the UAE (CEPA, 2022), Australia (ECTA, 2022), and the European Free Trade Association (TEPA, 2024), aimed at reducing overdependence on China and the United States. The deal also aligns with the United Kingdom's own tilt toward the Indo-Pacific after joining the CPTPP trade bloc in 2023. Geopolitically, it signals India's preference for calibrated bilateral deals over multilateral frameworks like RCEP, which it exited in 2019 over dairy and manufacturing concerns.
- 3CETA operates within the WTO framework's exception under GATT Article XXIV, which permits regional trade pacts eliminating tariffs on "substantially all trade" despite the Most-Favoured-Nation principle in GATT Article I. India's compliance machinery, run by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, will need strengthening so MSMEs can meet UK sanitary and phytosanitary requirements, an area also governed by the WTO's SPS Agreement. Weak enforcement capacity has historically eroded India's gains from past FTAs, a concern the editorial extends to CETA.
- 4The editorial's own figures anchor its case: CETA gives zero-duty access on 99% of India's exports, the UK takes about 3% of India's merchandise exports and 1% of its imports, and India's ASEAN deficit widened from roughly $10 billion in 2017 to nearly $44 billion in 2023. India-UK bilateral trade has hovered near $21 billion annually, with both governments targeting far higher volumes under the roadmap accompanying the pact. These numbers show both CETA's ambition and the historical risk that such gains go underused.
Related from CLAT Tribe Blogs
- Operation Sindoor — CLAT Current Affairs Guide
Master Operation Sindoor for CLAT 2026, Phalgam attack, legal angles, IWT suspension, key persons, weapons used & 10 practice MCQs. Your complete GK guide.