Back to Editorials
The Indian ExpressJuly 27, 2026

Dharmendra Pradhan’s exit affirms the young have been heard, larger listening needs to begin

As new beginnings are made, it becomes necessary to ring out the old. The resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, over a month after the start of students’ protests triggered by the NEET exam paper leak, is welcome. The minister has done the right thing by making way for someone who will now have to earn the trust of the students’ community. A community that, to its enormous credit, came together in a leaderless agitation and made itself heard. The twin issues of education and unemployment, which are crucial for a nation’s growth and shape its sense of the future, and yet which have been treated with a lack of urgency for years and decades, are now centerstage. It is the achievement of the satirical online platform, the Cockroach Janta Party, which gave the call, and the youth who responded in large numbers to the issues that were being raised, that a government whose instinct is to demonise and label the protester has sent a heartening message: It is listening. In days to come, this moment, and this listening, has to be taken forward. It will not be easy. To begin with, it will need an acknowledgement that there are no victors and vanquished — this is a rare and valuable moment precisely because it allows everyone to express their shared stakes in the issues that lie at its core. It must not be tarnished by point-scoring or retribution. Large challenges of politics and policy lie ahead. The Prime Minister has promised the setting up of fast-track courts. A tougher law that provides those courts statutory backing, lays down strict timelines for investigations and trials, and increases punishments for those involved in paper leaks and irregularities, is set to be introduced in Parliament. A law already exists — the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. No lessons seem to have been learnt from the lastNEETleak, also in 2024, or the recommendations of the high-powered committee constituted the same year under formerISROchairperson K Radhakrishnan to review the structure of the NTA and secure the fairness of the public exam system. It will be the responsibility of the people’s representatives, therefore — those who sit on the treasury benches as well as those who sit in the Opposition — to ensure that they do not let down the students again, and that the gains made by the movement in the past days and weeks are not frittered away. This is an opportunity to bring long-pending changes not just in the way examinations are held, but in the education eco-system as a whole. Larger questions must be raised and debated in Parliament, which can rearrange the way learning and skilling and access to opportunities are structured in a country of the young. All institutions have a role to play — the Supreme Court has said that it will closely monitor the Centre’s overhaul of the NEET. The SC will also hear petitions alleging police excesses against protesting students across the country. The question of disproportionate use of force by police on the young protesters must be addressed transparently and fairly. Most of all, this moment demands generosity and open-mindedness from the powerful — when the young speak, it cannot afford to turn a deaf ear or resort to an older playbook of criminalising dissent. It also demands humility and patience from the young — to be enduring, change will need to be mediated by processes and institutions.

Key GK Takeaways for CLAT
  • 1The promise of fast-track courts with statutory backing to try examination fraud cases would require a new law defining jurisdiction, timelines, and enhanced punishments, likely amending or supplementing the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. Fast-track and special courts already exist under statutes such as the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, offering a template for time-bound trial mechanisms. Whether such courts meaningfully reduce impunity will depend on adequate judicial staffing and prosecutorial capacity, not legislative intent alone.
  • 2The National Testing Agency, established in 2017 to conduct entrance examinations including NEET-UG and the Common University Entrance Test, has faced repeated credibility challenges after leaks in both 2024 and now, prompting the earlier Radhakrishnan committee review. Structural issues such as decentralised printing and distribution of question papers across thousands of centres have repeatedly been flagged as vulnerabilities. Credible reform would need to address these operational weaknesses directly, rather than relying solely on punitive legislation after the fact.
  • 3The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 already criminalises leaking question papers, impersonation, and tampering with answer sheets, prescribing prison terms and fines for organised cheating by service providers. The Supreme Court's stated intent to closely monitor the Centre's NEET overhaul echoes its supervisory role in past matters, where it retained oversight of an issue until statutory mechanisms matured. Overlapping jurisdiction between the National Testing Agency, the Union Education Ministry, and now direct judicial monitoring raises fresh questions about institutional accountability going forward.
  • 4NEET-UG has grown from roughly 6.3 lakh candidates in its early mandatory years after 2016 to around 20 to 24 lakh candidates in recent cycles, intensifying competition for a relatively static pool of just over one lakh MBBS seats nationally. This scale means systemic disruptions, such as a mass retest, carry significant social cost in lost academic time and mental health strain for lakhs of teenage aspirants and their families. Addressing the education-to-employment pipeline more broadly, as the editorial urges, is critical given that youth unemployment remains a persistent structural challenge in India's labour market.

Related from CLAT Tribe Blogs

Dharmendra Pradhan’s exit affirms the young have been heard, larger listening needs to begin